1. A simple idea: standard but optional review criteria for bioinformatics papers

    Brad Chapman (@chapmanb on twitter) wrote and signed a nice review of my submission to the Bioinformatics Open Source Conference. In his review, he said

    My only small suggestion is to include some discussion about your
    reproducibility work during the talk: the Amazon AMI, documentation
    and reproducible ipython workflows. This …
    read more

    There are comments.

  2. Our approach to replication in computational science

    I'm pretty proud of our most recently posted paper, which is on a sequence analysis concept we call digital normalization. I think the paper is pretty kick-ass, but so is the way in which we're approaching replication. This blog post is about the latter.

    (Quick note re "replication" vs "reproduction …

    read more

    There are comments.

« Page 49 / 60 »

social