So, it's nomination season for the Python Software Foundation again... and I have this niggling feeling that I'm forgetting about several people that have demonstrated significant commitment to the Python community, are good 'uns, and are otherwise people I would trust with some part of the future of Python and the community.

PSF membership "worthiness" is hard to define, but (for me) depends on more than just working in your own small patch of Python -- contributing broadly to GSoC/GHOP, for example, seems like a good criterion. Remember, people need a substantial positive vote by the existing PSF, too, so they should be Known. For some value of Known.

Any thoughts? Drop me a line.

--titus