6. A simple idea: standard but optional review criteria for bioinformatics papers

   Brad Chapman (@chapmanb on twitter) wrote and signed a nice review of my submission to the Bioinformatics Open Source Conference. In his review, he said

   My only small suggestion is to include some discussion about your
   reproducibility work during the talk: the Amazon AMI, documentation
   and reproducible ipython workflows. This …

   read more

   There are comments.

7. What I'm REALLY thinking about when I use your bioinformatics software

   If you're like me, we pretend to care about the science in bioinformatics software. But what we really do is try to find reasons not to outright loathe the software -- because, lud knows, there are usually plenty of reasons to hate it.

   In no particular order, here are the top …

   read more

   There are comments.

⇇ « Page 2 / 2