The latest hot shit idea for making a protein-protein interaction database leaves me lukewarm.
A few months ago I met with a genomics group, and we had a back-and-forth about genome annotation. The conversation went something like this:
them: "We have to improve the tools for annotating un-annotated genes!" me …read more
There are comments.
The pygr project is gearing up to do some code reviews, and we're not aware of too many (any?) mature (or even adolescent) tools that interact well with git. A Google search finds Gerrit and a blog post about Code Review -- anything else we should know about?
thanks, --titus
p …
read moreThere are comments.
We're going through the PyCon '09 review process, and participating in the process has been pretty interesting. (I joined the Program Committee in large part because I was told to put up or shut up after I critiqued PyCon '08. Ahh, the open source world... where you're encouraged to go …
read moreThere are comments.
The ongoing debate about doctests (here, and links therein) seems to me to be somewhat silly.
doctests should be assessed by their utility to you and your project, in whatever role you happen to be using them. I personally find them to be very useful in API documentation, where they …
read moreThere are comments.
As a new prof, I've been too busy to blog much. What am I doing?
Apart from all the normal academic crud (meeting with people, answering e-mail, doing paperwork, etc.) and parenting & home ownership stuff, I've been teaching my Intro to Database-Backed Web Programming course. This has been neither a …
read moreThere are comments.
This post on why academics should work to integrate their research ideas with open source software in order to actually push forward on the OSS side (and presumably vice versa) is really good. I think such things could be applied in software testing, too, where there's a gulf between how …
read moreThere are comments.