6. Proposal: Integrating the OSF into Galaxy as a remote data store

   Note - this was an internal funding request solicited by the Center for Open Science. It's been funded!

   Brief: We propose to integrate OSF into Galaxy as a data store. For this purpose, we request 3 months of funding (6 months, half-time) for one developer, plus travel.

   Introduction and summary: Galaxy …

   read more

   There are comments.

7. Popping the open source/open science bubble.

   One of the things that became clear to me over the last two weeks is just how much of a open source/open science bubble my blog and Twitter commenters live in. Don't take that as a negative -- I'm in here with you, and it's a great place to live …

   read more

   There are comments.

8. More on scientific software

   So I wrote this thing that got an awful lot of comments, many telling me that I'm just plain wrong. I think it's impossible to respond comprehensively :). But here are some responses.

   What is, what could be, and what should be

   In that blog post, I argued that software shouldn't …

   read more

   There are comments.

9. Is software a primary product of science?

   Update - I've written Yet Another blog post, More on scientific software on this topic. I think this blog post is a mess so you should read that one first ;).

   ---

   This blog post was spurred by a simple question from Pauline Barmby on Twitter. My response didn't, ahem, quite fit in …

   read more

   There are comments.

10. Dear Doc Brown: how can I find a postdoc where I can do open science?

    I got the following e-mail from a student I know -- lightly edited to protect the innocent:

    I am at the stage where I am putting together a list of people that I want to post-doc with.

    So, a question to you:

    1. How can I find people who do open science …

    read more

    There are comments.

11. First thoughts on Galileo's Middle Finger

    I'm reading Galileo's Middle Finger by Dr. Alice Dreger (@alicedreger), and it's fantastic. It's a paean to evidence-based popular discourse on scientific issues -- something I am passionate about -- and it's very well written.

    I bought the book because I ran across Dr. Dreger's excellent and hilarious live-tweeting of her son's …

    read more

    There are comments.

12. Please destroy this software after publication. kthxbye.

    tl;dr? A while back I wrote that there are three uses of research software: replication, reproduction, and reuse. The world of computational science would be better off if people clearly delineated whether or not they wanted anyone else to reuse their software, and I think it's a massive mistake …

    read more

    There are comments.

⇇ « Page 22 / 60 » ⇉