Software and data good.
read moreThere are comments.
Publishing Open Source Research Software in JOSS - an experience report
Our first JOSS submission (paper? package?) is about to be accepted and I wanted to enthuse about the process a bit.
JOSS, the Journal of Open Source Software, is a place to publish your research software packages. Quoting from the about page,
The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS) is …
read moreThere are comments.
Why software development practice matters, Containerization version
A while back, Kai Blin (via Nick Loman) asked Michael Barton:
If we containerize all these things won't it just encourage worse software development practices; right now developers still need to consider someone other than themselves installing the software.
and Michael Barton's response, transcribed, was:
"It's a good point. Ultimately …
read moreThere are comments.
Sustaining the development of research-focused software
Recently I was asked by someone at a funding organization about the term "hardening software"; I wrote a blog post asking others what they thought, and this got a number of great comments (as well as spurring Dan Katz to write a blog post of his own). I'd already written …
read moreThere are comments.
What do you think about the term & practice of "hardening software"?
I just received an e-mail from someone in the funding world who thinks a lot about software, and they were interested in any thoughts I might have on the term "software hardening", and its practice. To quote,
This is about making research software more robust, more easily usable and possibly …
read moreThere are comments.
A response to "The myths of bioinformatics software"
This is a response to (parts of) Dr. Lior Pachter's post, "The myths of bioinformatics software". (You can also see my post on bioinformatics software licensing for at least some of the background arguments.)
I agree with a lot of what Lior says: most bioinformatics software is not very good …
read moreThere are comments.
Please destroy this software after publication. kthxbye.
tl;dr? A while back I wrote that there are three uses of research software: replication, reproduction, and reuse. The world of computational science would be better off if people clearly delineated whether or not they wanted anyone else to reuse their software, and I think it's a massive mistake …
read moreThere are comments.