1. A simple idea: standard but optional review criteria for bioinformatics papers

    Brad Chapman (@chapmanb on twitter) wrote and signed a nice review of my submission to the Bioinformatics Open Source Conference. In his review, he said

    My only small suggestion is to include some discussion about your
    reproducibility work during the talk: the Amazon AMI, documentation
    and reproducible ipython workflows. This …
    read more

    There are comments.

  2. The Parable of the Mad Photocopier

    (I came across this fragmentary blog post that I wrote sometime in December. It's a fine example of a failed allegory. To what, I'll let you determine for yourself. Anyway, in case anyone wants to know what dreck doesn't make it out of my computer onto the Intarweb, well, here's …

    read more

    There are comments.

  3. « Page 47 / 93 »

    Proudly powered by pelican, which uses python.

    The theme is subtlely modified from one by Smashing Magazine, thanks!

    For more about this blog's author, see the main site or the lab site

    While the author is employed by the University of California, Davis, his opinions are his own and almost certainly bear no resemblance to what UC Davis's official opinion would be, had they any.